[ad_1]
\n<\/p>\n
Speaking at the XDC Conference, CryptoLaw Founder and Amicus Curiae attorney John Deaton talked about the infamous William Hinman speech, saying<\/a>,<\/p>\n \u201cDon\u2019t rule out there could be a case against certain individuals because you\u2019re not allowed to conspire to then create a monopoly for a certain group of people. A lot of people don\u2019t know is that ETH<\/a> investors, a16z, literally helped write the speech. Where\u2019s Hinman a partner today, a16z.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n a16z<\/a> is a venture capital firm focused on crypto and Web3 startups, with over $7.6 billion in assets under management.<\/p>\n Over the weekend, there were no updates from the ongoing SEC v Coinbase (COIN<\/a>) case. However, the crypto community has highlighted the significance of the SEC v Coinbase case and the likely impact of a Coinbase win.<\/p>\n Amicus Curiae and CryptoLaw founder John E. Deaton had this to say<\/a> about the SEC case against Coinbase,<\/p>\n \u201cThere\u2019s a legitimate chance in the Coinbase case, there\u2019s a legitimate chance that the Judge can even dismiss the case by saying on this motion to dismiss, which would normally never be granted, by saying that when you go to an exchange and you engage in a blind bid ask transaction you don\u2019t know who you\u2019re buying it from.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Deaton went on to say,<\/p>\n \u201cThe exchange is not the issuer anyway, Coinbase or Uphold are not the issuer, so how can you rely on the efforts of someone else you don\u2019t know you\u2019re purchasing it from.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n Deaton concluded,<\/p>\n \u201cThe Judge could say as a matter of law Howey does not apply to the secondary market transactions. These are just asset sales. If we get that decision and we get the Grayscale decision on the Bitcoin-Spot ETF, I believe that\u2019s going to then create the landscape of us moving forward.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n This month, Republican Senator Cynthia Lummis, among others, filed<\/a> Amicus Curiae briefs, requesting the Court to dismiss the case.<\/p>\n A favorable outcome to the Court filing could cement the Judge Torres ruling on XRP and Programmatic Sales. Significantly, it could also end the SEC\u2019s rein of regulation by enforcement.<\/p>\n After a range-bound weekend, investors will return their attention to the SEC v Ripple case. Following the SEC motion<\/a> for interlocutory appeal, Ripple must file opposition to the motion by September 1. An early filing will influence investor sentiment.<\/p>\n Convincing language in opposition of the SEC motion would provide price support. However, investors will remain in limbo until after an SEC response to a Ripple filing. The SEC must file its response to any Ripple opposition by September 8.<\/p>\n After Ripple and the SEC have completed the required steps, Judge Torres will rule on the SEC motion for interlocutory appeal. It remains unclear on the timeframe for a Court ruling. Uncertainty will likely test buyer appetite.<\/p>\n However, we expect the crypto market to respond to SEC v Binance and SEC v Coinbase-related news and updates on the spot-ETF applications.<\/p>\n\n
John E. Deaton Emphasizes the Importance of the Coinbase Case<\/h2>\n
\n
\n
\n
The Monday Session<\/h2>\n
XRP Price Action<\/h2>\n