{"id":42003,"date":"2025-04-07T16:49:18","date_gmt":"2025-04-07T19:49:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/2025\/04\/07\/stocks-and-usd-disconnect-huge-implications-for-gold-and-commodities\/"},"modified":"2025-04-07T16:49:18","modified_gmt":"2025-04-07T19:49:18","slug":"stocks-and-usd-disconnect-huge-implications-for-gold-and-commodities","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/2025\/04\/07\/stocks-and-usd-disconnect-huge-implications-for-gold-and-commodities\/","title":{"rendered":"Stocks and USD Disconnect \u2013 Huge Implications for Gold and Commodities"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> [ad_1]<br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Some of the panic is already taking place.<\/p>\n<p>Is this emotional selling? Yes, some say that all decisions to buy or sell are emotional. But the point is that it\u2019s not JUST emotional selling (and there is a good reason why searches for \u201cgold and silver IRA investment near me\u201d are booming). These trades have strong fundamental backing. Tariffs limit trade. They limit sales. They limit profits. And thus, they limit stock values.<\/p>\n<p>Remember all those words that I wrote in the previous weeks about the possible stagflation? This all even more likely now. Limited imports mean higher prices for companies and (ultimately) consumers.<\/p>\n<p>This time, the panic makes sense. Many will catch up with sales only after stocks decline much more \u2013 just like it was the case in 2008 and 2020.<\/p>\n<p>Moving back to the disconnect between stocks and the USD Index \u2013 why is it so important?<\/p>\n<p>Because declining and rising USD Index are both signals for commodities and precious metals. The fact that gold, silver, copper, crude oil, and other commodities declined on April 3 despite a 2% slide in the USD Index is extremely bearish on its own. The latter\u2019s decline \u201cshould\u201d make commodities soar. Seeing a small rally or no rally would be bearish.<\/p>\n<p>But silver and crude oil were down by over 7%! This is epic. This is the first step to much bigger declines that will materialize once the USD Index finally does soar. And just as it seemed \u201cimpossible\u201d for the USD Index to rally at its 2008 (final) bottom, it may seem that this is impossible now.<\/p>\n<p>Please look at the 2008 chart once again \u2013 yes, it IS possible.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>Ok, but why is the USD Index likely to rally given the tariffs, again?<\/em><\/p>\n<h2 id=\"usd-index-and-tariffs-\u2013-the-real-bullish-link\">USD Index and Tariffs \u2013 the Real (Bullish) Link<\/h2>\n<p>Right now media attention has focused primarily on potential inflationary impacts. However, substantial <strong>historical and economic evidence suggests these tariffs will likely strengthen the US dollar significantly in coming months<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>The basic economic mechanism is straightforward: <strong>tariffs reduce domestic demand for imports, which decreases demand for foreign currencies<\/strong> needed to purchase those goods, while demand for the USD remains relatively stable.<\/p>\n<p>Additionally, trade uncertainty typically triggers safe-haven capital flows into US assets, further strengthening the dollar.<\/p>\n<p>Historical precedents strongly support this relationship. <strong>During Trump\u2019s 2018-2019 trade war with China, the dollar appreciated by 4%<\/strong> on a multilateral basis while tariff news explained approximately two-thirds of the renminbi\u2019s depreciation during that period according to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/abs\/pii\/S0261560624000020\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">this research paper<\/a>. Similarly, during Reagan\u2019s targeted tariffs against Japanese imports in the early 1980s, the USD experienced one of its strongest bull markets, appreciating approximately 50% between 1980-1985. Even Bush\u2019s 2002 steel tariffs provided temporary support for the dollar during an otherwise bearish period.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/budgetlab.yale.edu\/research\/tariffs-dollar-and-fed\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">Academic research<\/a> further confirms this relationship, with an IMF working paper concluding that \u201con average, a 1 percentage point increase in tariffs leads to a 0.25-0.4 percent appreciation of the real effective exchange rate\u201d after controlling for other factors. A comprehensive Federal Reserve Bank of New York <a href=\"https:\/\/taxfoundation.org\/blog\/trump-tariffs-us-dollar-currency-appreciation\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\">study<\/a> examining 151 countries over five decades found that increased import barriers consistently led to currency appreciation for the implementing country, with the effect magnified for reserve currencies like the USD due to their global financial role.<\/p>\n<p>The relationship can be understood through simple analogies: imagine currency exchange as water flowing between connected tanks, with tariffs inserting a partial dam restricting outward dollar flow for imports. With reduced outflow but unchanged inflow, the dollar\u2019s value rises. Similarly, if the dollar is like a concert ticket to buy American goods, tariffs reduce the need for these \u201ctickets\u201d by foreigners (who buy fewer imports) while the tickets\u2019 desirability for investment and security remains intact, increasing their value.<\/p>\n<p>Interestingly, unlike typical economic scenarios where tariffs might be offset by retaliatory measures, Trump\u2019s simultaneous application of tariffs across multiple partners potentially magnifies the dollar effect. While retaliation would normally dampen the currency impact, the broad-based approach makes coordinated responses more difficult and potentially less effective, leaving the dollar appreciation mechanism relatively intact despite international tensions.<\/p>\n<p>The implications are significant: while much attention has focused on the inflationary impacts of tariffs, historical patterns and economic theory strongly suggest that <strong>Trump\u2019s new tariffs could provide substantial bullish momentum for the USD Index<\/strong> in the coming quarters, creating a more complex economic picture than many analysts currently recognize.<\/p>\n<p>\u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <em>So\u2026 Why did the USD Index plunge now?<\/em><\/p>\n<p>The markets are logical (as per the above-discussed research) eventually, but they are emotional in the short run.<\/p>\n<p>The public\u2019s focus is now on the inflationary aspects and on the turmoil that it all causes. But the dust will settle. The economists and professional analysts (not only journalists that seek sensations) will write about this and the investors will re-evaluate their approach and position themselves accordingly.<\/p>\n<p>As gold is viewed as an inflation hedge (incorrectly so, it\u2019s a hyperinflation hedge, but not one against regular, modest inflation), the emotional focus on inflationary aspect of tariffs cause people to buy gold and even mining stocks right now. This is all likely a temporary and emotional effect, while the powerful and dramatic 2008-style effects are likely to last \/ come into play.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This means a comeback of the USD Index, but a continuation of the decline in stocks. This means continuation of the declines and commodities (and perhaps even their acceleration) and decisive moves lower in case of gold, silver, and mining stocks.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong>Sure, we might see a correction here soon (and that\u2019s also an opportunity that we\u2019re aiming to take advantage of in my premium Gold Trading Alerts), but the bigger picture for the following months seems clear. And it doesn\u2019t look good for commodities or precious metals. Definitely not for junior mining stocks nor silver. Yes, I expect silver to soar well above it\u2019s 2011 high in the following years, but not without sliding substantially first. Remember \u2013 just because something is likely to happen eventually, it doesn\u2019t mean that it has to happen anytime soon, and something quite opposite might take placed temporarily. The good news is that this \u201csomething opposite\u201d can also be profitable if you just position yourself right.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Thank you for reading this analysis. If you\u2019d like to access our complete premium analysis, including specific technical targets (even options), detailed analysis of mining stocks, and comprehensive portfolio insights, consider subscribing to our\u00a0Gold Trading Alerts. I also invite you to stay updated with our free analyses \u2013\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.goldpriceforecast.com\/gold-newsletter\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"nofollow noopener noreferrer\"><strong>sign up for our free gold newsletter now<\/strong><\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Thank you.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Przemyslaw K. Radomski, CFA<\/strong><br \/>Founder, Editor-in-chief<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p>[ad_2]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>[ad_1] Some of the panic is already taking place. Is this emotional selling? Yes, some say that all decisions to buy or sell are emotional. But the point is that it\u2019s not JUST emotional selling (and there is a good reason why searches for \u201cgold and silver IRA investment near me\u201d are booming). These trades have strong fundamental backing. Tariffs limit trade. They limit sales. They limit profits. And thus, they limit stock values. Remember all those words that I wrote in the previous weeks about the possible stagflation? This all even more likely now. Limited imports mean higher prices for companies and (ultimately) consumers. This time, the panic makes sense. Many will catch up with sales only after stocks decline much more \u2013 just like it was the case in 2008 and 2020. Moving back to the disconnect between stocks and the USD Index \u2013 why is it so important? Because declining and rising USD Index are both signals for commodities and precious metals. The fact that gold, silver, copper, crude oil, and other commodities declined on April 3 despite a 2% slide in the USD Index is extremely bearish on its own. The latter\u2019s decline \u201cshould\u201d make commodities soar. Seeing a small rally or no rally would be bearish. But silver and crude oil were down by over 7%! This is epic. This is the first step to much bigger declines that will materialize once the USD Index finally does soar. And just as it seemed \u201cimpossible\u201d for the USD Index to rally at its 2008 (final) bottom, it may seem that this is impossible now. Please look at the 2008 chart once again \u2013 yes, it IS possible. \u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 Ok, but why is the USD Index likely to rally given the tariffs, again? USD Index and Tariffs \u2013 the Real (Bullish) Link Right now media attention has focused primarily on potential inflationary impacts. However, substantial historical and economic evidence suggests these tariffs will likely strengthen the US dollar significantly in coming months. The basic economic mechanism is straightforward: tariffs reduce domestic demand for imports, which decreases demand for foreign currencies needed to purchase those goods, while demand for the USD remains relatively stable. Additionally, trade uncertainty typically triggers safe-haven capital flows into US assets, further strengthening the dollar. Historical precedents strongly support this relationship. During Trump\u2019s 2018-2019 trade war with China, the dollar appreciated by 4% on a multilateral basis while tariff news explained approximately two-thirds of the renminbi\u2019s depreciation during that period according to this research paper. Similarly, during Reagan\u2019s targeted tariffs against Japanese imports in the early 1980s, the USD experienced one of its strongest bull markets, appreciating approximately 50% between 1980-1985. Even Bush\u2019s 2002 steel tariffs provided temporary support for the dollar during an otherwise bearish period. Academic research further confirms this relationship, with an IMF working paper concluding that \u201con average, a 1 percentage point increase in tariffs leads to a 0.25-0.4 percent appreciation of the real effective exchange rate\u201d after controlling for other factors. A comprehensive Federal Reserve Bank of New York study examining 151 countries over five decades found that increased import barriers consistently led to currency appreciation for the implementing country, with the effect magnified for reserve currencies like the USD due to their global financial role. The relationship can be understood through simple analogies: imagine currency exchange as water flowing between connected tanks, with tariffs inserting a partial dam restricting outward dollar flow for imports. With reduced outflow but unchanged inflow, the dollar\u2019s value rises. Similarly, if the dollar is like a concert ticket to buy American goods, tariffs reduce the need for these \u201ctickets\u201d by foreigners (who buy fewer imports) while the tickets\u2019 desirability for investment and security remains intact, increasing their value. Interestingly, unlike typical economic scenarios where tariffs might be offset by retaliatory measures, Trump\u2019s simultaneous application of tariffs across multiple partners potentially magnifies the dollar effect. While retaliation would normally dampen the currency impact, the broad-based approach makes coordinated responses more difficult and potentially less effective, leaving the dollar appreciation mechanism relatively intact despite international tensions. The implications are significant: while much attention has focused on the inflationary impacts of tariffs, historical patterns and economic theory strongly suggest that Trump\u2019s new tariffs could provide substantial bullish momentum for the USD Index in the coming quarters, creating a more complex economic picture than many analysts currently recognize. \u2013\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 So\u2026 Why did the USD Index plunge now? The markets are logical (as per the above-discussed research) eventually, but they are emotional in the short run. The public\u2019s focus is now on the inflationary aspects and on the turmoil that it all causes. But the dust will settle. The economists and professional analysts (not only journalists that seek sensations) will write about this and the investors will re-evaluate their approach and position themselves accordingly. As gold is viewed as an inflation hedge (incorrectly so, it\u2019s a hyperinflation hedge, but not one against regular, modest inflation), the emotional focus on inflationary aspect of tariffs cause people to buy gold and even mining stocks right now. This is all likely a temporary and emotional effect, while the powerful and dramatic 2008-style effects are likely to last \/ come into play. This means a comeback of the USD Index, but a continuation of the decline in stocks. This means continuation of the declines and commodities (and perhaps even their acceleration) and decisive moves lower in case of gold, silver, and mining stocks. Sure, we might see a correction here soon (and that\u2019s also an opportunity that we\u2019re aiming to take advantage of in my premium Gold Trading Alerts), but the bigger picture for the following months seems clear. And it doesn\u2019t look good for commodities or precious metals. Definitely not for junior mining stocks nor silver. Yes, I expect silver to soar well above it\u2019s 2011 high in the following years, but not without sliding substantially first. Remember \u2013 just because something is likely to happen eventually, it doesn\u2019t mean<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":42004,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42003","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-financas"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42003","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42003"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42003\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42004"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42003"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42003"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42003"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}