Light Crude Oil Futures<\/a> are trading $57.13, down $2.46 or -4.11%.<\/p>\nTariffs Threaten Global Oil Demand Outlook<\/h2>\n
The renewed trade tensions raise serious questions about future oil demand, especially from China\u2014the world\u2019s second-largest oil consumer. Rystad Energy\u2019s Ye Lin warned that the country\u2019s oil demand growth, estimated between 50,000 to 100,000 barrels per day, is at risk if the standoff persists. While Beijing may counter with domestic stimulus to sustain consumption, investor confidence is being tested.<\/p>\n
China has vowed to fight the tariffs \u201cto the end\u201d and launched countermeasures, including a fresh 34% tariff on all U.S. imports. Analysts at Eurasia Group suggest these tariffs could eliminate Chinese exporters\u2019 profit margins, effectively halting trade with the U.S. in some sectors, further complicating economic recovery and weakening global crude demand.<\/p>\n
Supply-Side Pressures Build With OPEC+ Output Hike<\/h2>\n
Adding to bearish sentiment is the recent OPEC+ decision to increase output by 411,000 barrels per day in May. With demand uncertainty rising, traders are now bracing for a potential supply glut. Goldman Sachs revised its oil price projections, forecasting Brent to dip to $62 per barrel by the end of 2025, and further to $55 by 2026.<\/p>\n
Russia\u2019s ESPO Blend, a key Asian crude grade, slipped below the $60 Western price cap for the first time, reflecting broader market weakness. The price drop is a signal of increasing stress within global oil benchmarks as geopolitical and trade frictions intensify.<\/p>\n
Inventory Draw Offers Limited Support<\/h2>\n
U.S. crude stockpiles provided a rare positive, with the American Petroleum Institute reporting a 1.1 million barrel draw last week, versus expectations for a 1.4 million barrel build. However, the bullish impact from the drawdown was largely overshadowed by broader macroeconomic and geopolitical risks.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
[ad_2]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
[ad_1] At 10:55 GMT, Light Crude Oil Futures are trading $57.13, down $2.46 or -4.11%. Tariffs Threaten Global Oil Demand Outlook The renewed trade tensions raise serious questions about future oil demand, especially from China\u2014the world\u2019s second-largest oil consumer. Rystad Energy\u2019s Ye Lin warned that the country\u2019s oil demand growth, estimated between 50,000 to 100,000 barrels per day, is at risk if the standoff persists. While Beijing may counter with domestic stimulus to sustain consumption, investor confidence is being tested. China has vowed to fight the tariffs \u201cto the end\u201d and launched countermeasures, including a fresh 34% tariff on all U.S. imports. Analysts at Eurasia Group suggest these tariffs could eliminate Chinese exporters\u2019 profit margins, effectively halting trade with the U.S. in some sectors, further complicating economic recovery and weakening global crude demand. Supply-Side Pressures Build With OPEC+ Output Hike Adding to bearish sentiment is the recent OPEC+ decision to increase output by 411,000 barrels per day in May. With demand uncertainty rising, traders are now bracing for a potential supply glut. Goldman Sachs revised its oil price projections, forecasting Brent to dip to $62 per barrel by the end of 2025, and further to $55 by 2026. Russia\u2019s ESPO Blend, a key Asian crude grade, slipped below the $60 Western price cap for the first time, reflecting broader market weakness. The price drop is a signal of increasing stress within global oil benchmarks as geopolitical and trade frictions intensify. Inventory Draw Offers Limited Support U.S. crude stockpiles provided a rare positive, with the American Petroleum Institute reporting a 1.1 million barrel draw last week, versus expectations for a 1.4 million barrel build. However, the bullish impact from the drawdown was largely overshadowed by broader macroeconomic and geopolitical risks. [ad_2]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":42272,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[45],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42271","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-financas"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42271","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42271"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42271\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/42272"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42271"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42271"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tiproject.online\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42271"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}